nice.
jonkopp at 2005-05-03 07:25:48

is the vignetting natural or not
michael at 2005-05-03 11:04:01

I never met a iron bust I didn't like.
sac at 2005-05-03 11:25:11

this is such a great shot, but i agree, the weird vignetting is a problem. not that weird vignetting is always a bad thing. just here it is. which is okay, because, all things considered, i think lately you've been on a roll.
butter at 2005-05-03 11:34:10

There is no vignetting problem in this photograph.
Eliot at 2005-05-03 11:36:05

This and the cherry blossoms rock.
mjulius at 2005-05-03 12:06:38

Ha, your Jedi mind tricks are useless.
sac at 2005-05-03 12:41:47

i like how eliot only comments when he is seemingly pissed off. or someone is hitting on his lady subject. ;=)

I enjoy your work. thanks!
liz at 2005-05-03 15:10:29

The teeth on the bust are fantastic!!!
kenny at 2005-05-03 15:25:45

I love both smiles in this photograph... :) :)
+..dphotoJournal...+ at 2005-05-03 20:56:08

michael, I think this is a zoomed-in flash head. And it rocks.
franz at 2005-05-03 22:27:32

remember when, a year or two ago, quarlo got locked into that crazy cross-processed style for so long? do you remember thinking after a while: dude, what are you doing – that could have been a great shot? that’s all I’m saying about the zoomed flash thing.
butter at 2005-05-03 23:04:07

The last zoomed flash thing I can find on this site is from March third.
Eliot at 2005-05-04 02:23:42

correct! and i for one am happy you haven't let yourself get locked into this stylistic device. it's not so bad, really, especially every now and then, but here i think it distracts from what is essentially a fantastic picture.
butter at 2005-05-04 07:15:19

grin echoing grin. super!
lynn at 2005-05-12 06:29:51

the two smiles - you're a genius
barlow at 2005-06-18 19:52:54

	Add a comment
Name	[required]
URL	[include http://]
	How many letters are in the word "SLOWER"? (Type the digit)  [required to block spam]
Comment
Remember me?